.0.0
cerer €3S 39
#
.IV
290
.009£
t
zure ere" qu?
-190X7 N60° ngheIworolas og turonosi erið avad I
10 Fosius 9J 110
,bid to tevzal algono [ -
hogearbba thannis evsd 1 2000 vs tout end to vitebouli
smilesh (79abdira era no yane/Isox¶ wo¥ or redzef 9:10
I cane galvaspat bus teccel a
Welw viisionga
2 X83 JNAMITIEVOD suit weby eris 03 na bonerişilme si bf carta
even though the order has received the sanction of the
Secretary of State. The ruling which has been given on
this subject seriously hampers the administration of
justice: I have said so over and over again, and the most
curious point about this correspondence is that this seems
to have been ignored by Your Excellency. I must presume
that this is a matter which is not without interest to the
Government; I should have expected that it would have form-
-ed the subject of anxious consideration and consultation
with myself as Chief Justice; yet, although Your Excellency
has apparently had many consultations with the Registrars
.1780 DOVE Nİ MİN elgnoo me I dobaw ::o
ANCOBA oni to
and other Officers of the Registry, it was only with the
ana bbrocɛ I tant arenner von Teox wo?
greatest difficulty that I could obtain an interview. I
ets:2 to vutanga? wyt v beneblanoo--* af Reloa
vhnerla Baji folre conan' oqZAtan aranizarlow are to welw ab
*UFO COM At Ava
.93807 to virven097 9.7
or bulalæra need
aland ab toraluluba 1 *6: vore [[noz'" wuroy bitters of
31580706* I ezo yung Anɑ ɔ? b.s
t
vrolet est ni sufrent
ent to noirsuratlLmDa de 20 satufoo bi
1.etak ail
-ni dinlaw ebaut at TADEO na vnofo0 orz to exist ́e Ifvis
Zonnso I patriw soltert to noisesteinbrba ne rotw aerotros-
cannot take any responsibility for the volume of correspond —
-ence which has grown round what is to my mind a very
simple matter: nor for the voluminous correspondence to
which other questions have given rise to which Your Excel-
-lency has referred in paragraph 1 of the letter under
reply. I have had to write on subjects with which I am
perfectly familiar; they do not from their technical
ert dan os THD v at
bodcom Imunts and id beretia ton
etdy bas (bus cærir of sfdineog nottatacɛonqor Jaequonda
IKEATAS
nature come within the range of Your Excellency's ex-
-perience: but I seem to be invariably unsuccessful in
putting my views before Your Excellency: it is a fact
+ nut
.0.0
cerer €3S 39
#
.IV
290
.009£
t
zure ere" qu?
-190X7 N60° ngheIworolas og turonosi erið avad I
10 Fosius 9J 110
,bid to tevzal algono [ -
hogearbba thannis evsd 1 2000 vs tout end to vitebouli
smilesh (79abdira era no yane/Isox¶ wo¥ or redzef 9:10
I cane galvaspat bus teccel a
Welw viisionga
2 X83 JNAMITIEVOD suit weby eris 03 na bonerişilme si bf carta
even though the order has received the sanction of the
Secretary of State. The ruling which has been given on
this subject seriously hampers the administration of
justice: I have said so over and over again, and the most
curious point about this correspondence is that this seems
to have been ignored by Your Excellency. I must preside
that this is a matter which is not without interest to the
Government; I should have expected that it would have form-
-ed the subject of anxious consideration and consultazion
with ryself as Chief Justice; yet, although Your Excellency
has apparently had many consultations with the Registrars
.1780 DOVE Nİ MİN elgnoo me I dobaw ::o
ANCOBA oni to
and other Officers of the Registry, it was only with the
ana bbrocɛ I tant arenner von Teox wo?
greatest difficulty that I could obtain an interview. I
ets:2 to vutanga? wyt v beneblanoo--* af Reloa
vhnerla Baji folre conan' oqZAtan aranizarlow are to welw ab
*UFO COM At Ava
.93807 to virven097 9.7
or bulalæra need
aland ab toraluluba 1 *6: vore [[noz'" wuroy bitters of
31580706* I ezo yung Anɑ ɔ? b.s
t
vrolet est ni sufrent
ent to noirsuratlLmDa de 20 satufoo bi
1.etak ail
-ni dinlaw ebaut at TADEO na vnofo0 orz to exist ́e Ifvis
Zonnso I patriw soltert to noisesteinbrba ne rotw aerotros-
cannot take any responsibility for the volume of correspond —
-ence which has grown round what is to my mind a very
simple matter: nor for the voluminous correspondence to
which other questions have given rise to which Your Excel-
-lency has referred in paragraph 1 of the letter under
reply. I have had to write on subjects with which I an
perfectly familiar; they do not from their technical
ert dan os THD v at
bodcom Imunts and id beretia ton
etdy bas (bus cærir of sfdineog nottatacɛonqor Jaequonda
IKEATAS
nature come within the range of Your Excellency's ex-
-perience: but I seam to be invariably unsuccessful in
putting my views before Your Excellency: it is a fact
+ nut
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.